OmegaT para Mac

I work in translations as a pro, and frankly I can't figure how to use this "thing"... It apparently is unable to open .doc or .rtf directly (I guess you have to use something else to convert them...) which is not user friendly, to say the least. It's great that it's free, but the learning curve looks quite steep right from the start (opening a document... 🤣) I'm sorry, maybe I'm missing something but I'll stick to my usual workflow until I find something better. For anyone interested: you can work with 2 word documents side by side (the original + the one where you type the translation) but I've found something nicer. Create 2 documents in BBEdit (one with the original text + an empty one) and run the "Find Differences" function, this way the original scrolls down while you're typing. Not perfect but fast enough and free. 😉

Current version is 3.1.9. :-)

I'm new to OmegaT. I use it for English to Japanese translation. I have trouble with creating translated documents. I created a translated document and opened with text edit. The document shows nothing but question marks like this ?????????????????????????????????????????? can anyone help me? My mac is 10.6.7 1

I've read the below comments made by the developer of OmegaT+ with sympathy, but after his appreciative words about the philosophy behind FOSS it's odd to see his licence not being a free software licence and OmegaT ("open source propireity") being under GPL. Perhaps I'm ignorant of something. From the OmegaT+ website: "Licence "Copyright (C) 2005-2009 by Raymond: Martin. This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later (the latest version is presently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/). Distribution of substantively modified versions of this document is prohibited without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. Distribution of the work or derivative of the work in any standard (paper) book form is prohibited unless prior permission is obtained from the copyright holder."

I've already got clues and I'm giving them to you about OmegaT. And I am someone who knows what they are talking about. I never said you insulted me, where did you read that? But you did mix up OmegaT and OmegaT+ and still have to some extent in this current reply. "OmegaT+ is a solid and improving alternative to the incredibly expensive Trados." Yes, this is the case, but I have only released one version of OmegaT+. So it is a little odd that you would think so. Insufficient information for you to come to that conclusion. When the next version (1.0.M2) is out then you might have a little more to go on. "It's tough to master (as are all translation memory programs) and there may be questions re. compatibility, but it is Mac-compatible and doesn't force you to use Windows and Word for Windows, etc." True. And newer OmegaT+ has improved compatibility on Mac (have been working on that in the past weeks). " As to the perhaps justifiably (perhaps not) upset laseray, how you were treated while working on OmegaT software development is something that Macupdate posters know nothing about and may or may not be relevant to how well the software works, but what seems clear is that you have a grudge against the software maker that may be more properly discussed and settled in another venue, such as a labor rights and/or intellectual property rights case. Not here at Macupdate, in my opinion, though I'm honest enough to admit I may be wrong." It is your opinion and I see no notice about not commenting on aspects beyond the basic usage or things that you deem appropriate. The points I make are germane due to the software being released as FOSS under the GPL. there is a whole philosophy behind that and it is very important, not just to me, but to the future of FOSS for projects to act properly. If projects do not want to conduct their activities in a just manner then they should go away or change their license. "In any case, please premise all your comments with the information re. your past work with the OmegaT team and your grudge against them. It's the honest thing to do." Excuse me, that would be rather long. Much of the activity is documented on public forums/mailing lists. And even if I point to proof, investigating by asking OmegaT (to see the other side) will only lead to them denying it, lying, and other incredibly skewed reactions. Plus I have already explained my position to others many times before. My inclination is to explain things in the way I want rather than having to submit a whole thesis before I may talk. Anyway, as long as their no kind of limit on how I might comment, I will comment as I like.